OPINION: Witt decision offers preview of post-DADT world

SANTA BARBARA -- Today, the Palm Center released a statement following the Sept. 24 ruling in favor of Air Force Major Margaret Witt in the U.S. District Court in Tacoma, Wash.

Witt was discharged under "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) in 2004 and must be reinstated, according to the ruling by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. However, the Department of Justice is expected to appeal this decision.

"Major Witt's victory shows us a future beyond 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,'" said Christopher Neff, deputy director of the Palm Center.

"This law has been shown to be detrimental to military readiness and a violation of the constitutional rights of gay and lesbian service members. These recent court rulings strengthen the position that President Obama need not appeal the constitutionality of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' here or in Log Cabin Republicans v. United States," Neff said.

Diane Mazur, Palm Center legal co-director and University of Florida law professor, also responded to Judge Leighton's written opinion in Witt.

"Witt and Log Cabin were the first challenges requiring the government to produce evidence that 'don't ask, don't tell' improved military readiness, and in both cases the government was unable to do so,” Mazur said. “The government pointed to an earlier case upholding the policy, Cook v. Gates, but there the court barred the plaintiffs from introducing evidence that 'don't ask, don't tell' harms the military and excused the government from producing any evidence at all. Once the policy is put to a test of fact, it fails."

Visit our Media Partners

Visit the San Diego Pix WebsiteVisit the FlawLes website GLBTNN Visit the Hillcrest Business Association websiteVisit the GLAAD websiteVisit the Uptown News websiteVisit the Gay San Diego websiteVisit the LavenderLens websiteVisit The Huffington Post websiteJust My Ticket